Tag Archives: LinkedIn

Social media maven Shashi Bellamkonda moves on

Bellamkonda Shashi cx 304 161x300 Social media maven Shashi Bellamkonda moves onGood luck to Shashi Bellamkonda in his new role over at Bozzuto Group, via the WaPo yesterday:

Uber-social media networker Shashi Bellamkonda is leaving his longtime post at Herndon’s Network Solutions and joining Greenbelt-based Bozzuto Group as vice president of digital marketing.

“I was writing a blog post on CEO blogs to follow in the D.C. region and Tom Bozzuto’s blog came up in the search, and while checking out the Bozzuto Group Web site, I saw that they had a position in digital media open,” Bellamkonda said. “I connected with the recruiter on Linkedin. I had met Jamie Gorski [who is the senior vice president for marketing] at a social media conference where she attended my talk, and so I reconnected with her and that led to getting this job. It’s a social media connection success story.”

Continue reading

Write online to be taken out of context

I am in the middle of guiding some new bloggers over at Marketing Conversation on how to blog most effectively. It is pretty exciting and instructive because there are many things I take for granted.

derrida1 Write online to be taken out of contextOne of the biggest trends I see is internal shorthand. What I mean is that my bloggers tend to write based on a lot of assumed context.

They simply assume that people who are reading content from Marketing Conversation or Because the Medium is the Message — or even an article on the corporate website — are in on the joke.  That they grok the context.

Not only is that not true but it is dangerous because I am guilty of it myself. I would say north of 80% of the people I engage with on a daily basis online don’t know that I am president of a digital agency with over fifty staff and dozens of clients.  I assume, too.  I assume that I shouldn’t be so self-referential because “they” surely know who I am by now, I have been branding for years.

Not so.

And I have not even gotten to the most important part: even if people know who you are, what you do, the company you own, and it’s products and services intimately, their brand perception hasn’t evolved with your business.  What I did in 2006 is quite a bit different than what Abraham Harrison does now, as a company.

Even worse, after we spend all of this time, resources, hours, money, and brain trust on creating insightful analysis and share it for free on our blogs and via Twitter and Facebook, we’re living in a Derridian world: “there’s nothing outside the text.”

In a world of excerpting, RSS-reading, sharing, retweeting, and sharing shares, simply all of the breadcrumbs required to bring a reader down the road back to you, your brand, and your sales channel needs to be contained not only in that blog post but also in that tweet, if possible.

Do not use acronyms unless you’re brand is that acronym. Every name of every employee should be linked to their bio on the corporate website at best case or to a LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook profile at the very least.  Every product or service should be linked to its exact corresponding sub-page on the corporate website if at all possible.

In blogging, we often do a much better job of linking to other people, companies, and blogs in the form of attribution than we do ourselves.

Even more essential to these constantly conceptualizing linking strategies is that the keywords should be hyperlinked and not some worthless [link] or a pithy here or there or my work or any of that, if at all possible.  Search abhors a pronoun.

Finally, any and all posts should be wrapped in analysis, if at all possible.  Don’t just excerpt a social media news article onto your blog or site, make it your own!  While collecting news and propagating it through your blog with attribution links and excerpts and all that can result in your colleagues and neighbors and even prospects to learn of your existence, you’re not really adding value when you just propagate — it is essential to interpret, analyze, and synthesize, allowing all the marrow of your experience to be extracted in answer to, “well, that’s great content but it is content from your competitor so maybe we should be using them instead of you if they’re so insightful.”

In a perfect world, with a corporate blog, people should be subscribing to and reading posts on Marketing Conversation in order to learn more about the products and services and quality of mind of Abraham Harrison and not just to get an aggregation of the latest social media marketing news.

Sometimes I forget that and it is something I would like to share with you in addition to sharing it with my new bloggers.

Continue reading

Build some social media marketing backbone you big wuss

wuss 300x300 Build some social media marketing backbone you big wussI recently received a comment chastising me for suggesting that your web site should be a trap from Peter Johnston, who said, “This attitude has no place in modern marketing. In a social world, trapped customers scream loudly enough for everyone to hear. The short term gain and the thrill of ‘we got one’ is rapidly replaced by a dearth of future prospects.” Firstly, Peter didn’t read the article at all because it’s not about that; secondly, I think this sort of mindset is wussy and misinformed. This sort of general point-of-view is actually dangerous for anyone who actually wants to be successful using social media as a marketing platform. Continue reading

A synergistic combination of social media and technical SEO

I am very grateful to of SEOmoz for doing the work that explains a little better how social media, online social networks, and the real-time web heavily influence the results that Google proffers when we search in the form of Experiments on Google+ and Twitter Influencing Search Rankings.

seo pyramid22 A synergistic combination of social media and technical SEOI have been doing this since 2003 for various agencies sort of by feel. But here’s a compilation of the results of Mr. Shepard’s experiments:Firstly, the real-time search you had been seeing from Google was highly-reliant on a direct firehose from Twitter, which has been mysteriously cut:

The mystery began on July 3rd when Google Realtime Search went dark. The next day we learned that the underlying cause was Google losing access to its special Twitter data feed.  The source of the disagreement is unclear, but the effects have been immediate. Realtime Search disappeared – all of it, not just the part that relied on Twitter. This included Realtime results from Google News, Blog Search links, Facebook fan page updates and more.

The direct result is that launching Google+, whether it was ready or not, was mandatory. Real time search of the real time web is essential in order to be competitive with Facebook and especially Twitter — the epitome of the real-time web — and so Google Plus is not an option, it is a requirement:

For the past two years Google used Twitter not only to power Realtime results, but also for faster indexation of content and, we believe, to

calculate Author Authority for use in their ranking algorithm. Google says they plan on reinstating Realtime with the power of Google+. But the network will have to grow significantly before this works.

With realtime results on, a highly-influential tweet, widely retweeted, could end up as the #2 result on Google within a couple hours. For reals. Not the old answer of, “I think we can get you onto the front page of Google within six months, no guarantee,” the natural SEO shop response of the past.

What my analysis is is that Google Abhors a Vacuum and so in the absence of a reliable realtime feed, Google will turn its algorithmic knobs and change the weighting to prioritize other sources such as the humble blog and other sources such as possibly Tumblr and Posterous — the closest thing to Twitter without being too bloggy, as well as location-based services that could possibly prioritize swarming behavior, location-aware live video, live photography, and lifestreaming.

Anyway, back to the facts from Mr. Shepard who has made a point of answering a lot of the questions I posited above with the following evidence:

After Google announced that they no longer used direct Twitter data, Rand created a previously unindexed webpage and tweeted it to his followers. Within 10 minutes, Google picked up a tweet scraper, but not the original post. After an hour we realized a mistake. We had inadvertently included a meta NOINDEX tag in the head of the webpage. Doh!  After  quick removal of the tag, it took Bing a full 6 hours to index the original URL, but still no Google. Not until 8 hours after the original tweet did Google index our URL. Eventually it ranked #1 for its targeted keyword phrase.

Google is indexing for effect, it seems, requiring triangulation from secondary references and auto-cross-posts from Twitter to sites like LinkedIn, Plaxo — and even Topsy — and the other secondary outlets, which can make a real mess of permalinks, an especially maddening thing when you’re developing a social media strategy that is must result in a directly-traceable set of metrics.

The SEO traceroute needs always be as direct and and quick as possible and cannot and should not be bounced all over the bloody earth. The good news, according to Shepard is:

Even without the Twitter firehose, it seems the Twitter effect still finds ways of maneuvering into Google’s search results.

But, much less directly but only because Twitter is the source, it is the spring, the font, from which many other indexing platforms, such as Topsy and Tweetmeme, get the grist for their mill — in other words, Google is working ever harder to pan as close to the gold vein as possible but really cannot get there any more but pans just downstream.

The secret here is now each and every tweet needs to break through a barrier into the “recommended tweets” and “top tweets” — effectively needing to make it as close to being a trending topic as possible, so that the secondary consumers — the Topies of the world — take notice of your work.  In other words, we’ll need retweets now more than ever before:

The more retweets a link receives, the better it seems to perform in search results and the more visibility it obtains with the social media aggregators referenced above. With Topsy, for example, a URL that makes it into their top 100 list achieves much more visibility than a single tweet.

A caveat, however, is that all of this is some more 3D chess: even if you start getting loads of retweets — for example, setting it up so that everyone in your multinational, global, company retweets everything you post to Twitter — that’s only the first part.

The next, more important, part is that you’ll also need to add Klout, Twitter Ranking, Social Mention, Twitter Counter, TweetStats, etc.In other words, you need to be both popular and important.

Popular without importance suggests fraud and gaming unless there is a secondary and tertiary rash of retweets, suggesting that maybe this low-caste, low-importance tweet contains new that is highly important, timely, rare, and powerful in much the same way that the influence and importance — where in the A-list you are listed — is conferred to you.

Well, search is a continuity of tactics and strategies. All of the tools that worked a decade ago are still being considered as part of the algorithm.  Information architecture and proper SEO strategy is essential still, no matter how influential social media, online social networks, and personal and brand prestige have become, it is still only a portion of what really put you, solidly, reliably, on page one of Google.

While social can get you there for a couple hours, a proper organic search engine optimization strategy will help nail you to the first page.  Cyrus Shepard of SEOmoz says it best in his last line of his article:

Tweets or Google shares alone don’t yet equate to long term ranking nirvana.  Employing a synergistic combination of social media and technical SEO savvy provides the best recipe for success.

Continue reading